AVAILABLE NOW!!!!!


Saturday, November 3, 2007

A rant.

On Sundays you can find me cracking steel chairs over wrestler’s heads in a local independent wrestling organization I co-own called Kings of Brutal Wrestling. Sporadically you can find me hunting down leads of local paranormal activity in the surrounding Mid Michigan area in hopes of finding my Michigan Paranormal Investigators (M.P.I.) next investigation. Did I mention I am a super senior at Saginaw Valley State University? Needless to say I spend a lot of nights writing essays and digging through mounds of notes or burying my nose deep into Malory’s writings. Yet despite all of these amazing and important aspects of my life there is one thing that I always make sure I have ample time for, Writing. So I have deiced to open my first blog with this quick introduction of who I am, and then go into a extremely long blurb about something’s that have always bothered me about “writers”.

Writing is my first love; it’s my therapeutic release from this crazy and often time depressing world in which we all commonly share. I have been writing forever. I’m twenty-five and I have finished my first novel “The Deity Chronicles: Journals of Bennett Kingsly” and am currently self publishing it to a decent amount of success through word of mouth. I spent four years writing it, and to this day I am still mastering and perfecting its every written word.

I’ve study this art form for three plus years. To say I have learned a lot about writing is nothing short of an understatement. If you think you’re a writer because you have taken an intro creative writing course (or even an intermediate class for that matter) then you’re in for a rude awakening. I won’t lie, I thought the same. I thought I was above the majority of those in these classes (which honestly I was). Countless times I have been greeted from my peers with praise outside of class, boasting at my skills with dialogue or my ability to clearly depict a specific scene. I was honored, flattered, even a little humbled. I grew cocky; I felt that there was nothing left to know about writing. I realized now I was a big fish in a small pond, clichéd intended.

Let me give one important piece of advice for anyone thinking about going into a creative writing as a major. Realize that the more you grow as a writer and the higher level of classes you will be enrolling in, that there is a much larger picture you’re missing out on. I don’t know how many people I have seen in advanced level writing courses that come into the workshop with generic unintuitive clichéd pieces of work. They fail to take into account the literary theories presented, they think they have mastered the basics concepts like dialogue, momentum, conflict, all of which are important yes, but have nothing to truly do with these courses… they call it “creative” writing for a purpose people.

Here is one main thing I have come to notice. There is always this struggle with these “upper” courses that boil down to two factions, The Elitists versus the Popular Culture. Elitists strive for the knowledge, study the literary theories; they strive to write for a higher purpose, manipulating writing for a reason; whether a statement or an act of artistic intent. Pop writers write what they like to read, what they see on television, what they expect when they go to a flick. They are not “high art”. So help me if you write a vampire short story about love or a fucking werewolf piece following all the stereotypes we’ve already read with Anne Rice, then fuck you.

Why would anyone want to read your crappy version when they can read someone who has already mastered it and made millions from it? I’m not saying you can’t write a vampire tale -I do however- think it would be very hard to. Here comes that artistic merit, that concept of creativity. Make it different so that we are not reading that clichéd bull shit. Leave that for those intermediate classes. You may even be praised for your pretty use of language. I don’t care how good of a writer you are, if you don’t present us something that’s at least fresh, then your barking up the wrong tree.

Here’s the problem. These poppers (that’s what I’m dubbing them) hold this hatred for the elitist who tell them straight up that there stories suck. They’re not saying they suck as writers (at least not always), but that the ‘story’ told sucks. There is a big difference; you should never get the two confused. Poppers get this chip on their shoulders and often times will pull away from the class, unwilling to take in this wealth of knowledge they are paying for. They write off the literary readings that are meant stimulate them into thinking about the higher order of concerns. Readings that are meant to make them question the knowledge of not just writing and art, but of life itself. Let’s face it, all great pieces of work reflect some form of life; if not then what merit does it hold? If the concept of Deus-Ex-Machina or Jean Baudrillard's ideals of Simulacra doesn’t interest the shit out of you, then perhaps you should be rethink yourself as a writer.

You should never, eeeever, limit your knowledge on a subject. Why would you turn your back on theory? Yes they are often times extremely hard to read, but once you open yourself up to the ideas and concepts you will find yourself in a whole new world of understanding. Once you learn to read under different lenses, whether its capitalism, post-structuralism, or Marxism, you will learn to manipulate them into your own writings consciously.

I’m not saying I’m an elitist by any means. I am saying that I am striving to become one. We all should.

3 comments:

Gary Allen said...

Joe

While I totally respect your love and respect for theory (as it can be most marvelous) I think you're misunderstanding something about pop culture writing.

Not everybody wants to be the next Derrida or Robbe-Grillet or Maurcie Blanchot (although I find them all interesting). And while yes, Anne Rice has written some of the best vampire novels but that's not to say that somebody can't write something better. And while nobody would consider it high-art or literature (I don't consider Anne Rice either of those, really) I don't think it's fair to say that those people are producing shit work.

Although I hate Shakespeare with a fiery passion I can't help but say: "There is nothing new under the sun." In my workshops I have read pieces that sounded like modifications on the Children of Men plot. I made sure to point that out but that isn't too say that the story will never be good, ever.

I will respect anybody as a person who goes into creative writing, because they're in for a highly competitive ride and an even greater level of competition as they progress, but writing high brow literature is not for everybody. Plenty of people sit around reading romance novels and science fiction novels and fantasy novels so we'll always needs nerds sitting around writing fan-fic to break out of their bubbles and start working on something else, but we need them nonetheless.

That said, all of this coming from a guy who was incredibly inspired by J.K. Rowling seems a little hypocritical. While Rowling can probably suck anybody into a story (myself included) and while she'll undoubtedly be read for generations due to the popularity of the book and due to the ease of read, I think you'd be hard pressed to find hyper-serious underlying meanings in the piece, unlike Tolkien or C.S. Lewis, whose Chronicles of Narnia are essentially biblical allegories.

I mean no respect, but was simply intrigued by your piece, had to add my two cents. Anyhow, keep updating. Keep writing.

J.L. Hickey said...

I am very glad you read and responded. However i think you miss understood my debate. I will outly admit that my fantasy writing is highly reguarded as genre pop culture lit. My novel is just that, the following sections of the series will be a combination of the two. Which is damn hard to pull off with fantasy. I will even admit to following some certian fantasy cliches and use them to my advntage.

However, when you get into your higher courses you have to realize that pop art is not the focus, and in fact it is a move away from these pop culture norms and a gateway into literary fiction. theres a biiig difference.

Take me for instance, i told my class i am a fantasy writer, and that although i heave delved into the art of literary fiction that i find myself more comfortable in this genere.

Blatantly i was told that if i were to write fantasy i would have a pretty hard time passing it through the class. That it is almost impossible to write a genre peice in the higher level of c.w. classes because they are so strongly viewed as popular culture. So i proved them wrong, and wrote probably the best peice of literary fantasy genre i have ever created.

I am also not trying to say that to write pop culture is bad. If you want to make money in writing, thats the main style you should look into. Those are the money makers.

In a nut shell. You will get to a point that literary fiction will trump pop cult in c.w. workshops.

Gary Allen said...

Oh God, now, I think that I missed the point of your rant entirely than.

I don't think that genre literature has anything to do with a creative writing fiction workshop for the most part, unless you're implementing it in the way in which Tolkien or Lewis employs fantasy or Vonnegut, Orwell, Asimov, use science fiction.

I think that you can still have poignant messages within genre literature, but if it's not a mainstay through the piece (like any of the aforementioned authors) then it's obviously not going to be regarded as anything much more than genre literature.

Terry Goodkind is a fantasy author (and not, as far as I understand in reading amazon.com reviews, incredibly groundbreaking or innovating) that I've read quite a number of his books, 5000 pages or so. Which is quite the number. At that, he's constantly pushing some of his own political agendas and so on, but I'm more engaged in his story because there's for more of that than there is in regards to his creation of the fantasy world and his character development.

I read Goodkind for the same reason I read Rowling, the plot and the characters and the story and the conflicts keep me interested and while I recognize that he has this or that to say about the government currently in office through his own writing, he's not really so skilled in that area so that I'm willing to buy that.

Now if you can pull off the C.S. Lewis bit, then maybe you're on to something, but it'll be, perhaps, more difficult in that the agendas you choose to pursue may not jive with a young adult culture, or the story (and I'm not sure about anything you've written really, so this is speculation) about a young wizard may not appeal to adults, or more specifically, to literary snobs.

At that, I'm a bit confused by your elitism stance. It seems to be a bit of your own theory (while the concept of elitism is in no way new) perhaps you're applying it different.

Not that you have to respond in here in regards to that subject matter, I'm interested in you giving an introspection into your (again, perhaps) theory of elitism.